the Violet
E H Visiak

E H Visiak was born Edward Harold Physick in Ealing, London, on the 20th July 1878, to Edward Joseph Physick (1852–1921) and Maude Ann Physick (née Searcy, 1854–1952).

Edward Joseph was a sculptor, and son of the sculptor Edward James Physick (1829–1906), who was himself a son of the sculptor Edward Gustavus Physick (1802–1875), who was one of three sculptor-sons born to the — yes — sculptor Edward William Physick (1774–1862). The Physick family combined artistic accomplishment (Edward James, for instance, winning a gold medal from the Royal Academy in 1849[1] for his “Rape of Proserpine”) with successful business, in an age where there was a high demand for mortuary and memorial statuary. Visiak’s maternal grandfather, John Searcy (1813–1898), on the other hand, was confectioner to the Duke of Northumberland before moving to London and founding Searcys, a catering and restaurant firm still in business to this day.

Advert for E J Physick’s services as a sculptor, from The Times, 1866

Visiak was the first of seven sons born to Edward Joseph and Maude, his brothers being John Searcy (1880–1957), Frank Savill (1882–1983), Arthur Cecil (1883–1938), William Gordon (1886–1919), Algernon Sidney (1889–1977) and Noel Gilbert (1894–1911).

According to his memoir, Life’s Morning Hour, Visiak was first educated at the school of a Mrs Peters, then at “Eversleigh College”, then a church school (“a nightmare in a sordid dimension, dark and dingy”[2]), then a few terms at “Hallingford” Grammar School, until homesickness forced his return, and finally an unnamed school in London. “Eversleigh” and “Hallingford” seem to be fictional names. “Hallingford”, for instance, is actually Hitchin Grammar School (which is named as Visiak’s school in other biographical sources[3]). The enrolment records of St Augustine’s School, Westminster,[4] meanwhile, list both Edward Harold Physick and two of his brothers as attending (Visiak did so between the ages of 10 and 13, after which the statutory education of the period ended), so that is likely the unnamed London school.

The fact these same two brothers, John and Frank, were choristers at the Chapel Royal and sang, in 1893, at the wedding of Prince George, Duke of York[5] (later to become King George V), gives some idea of the family’s standing, or at least its aspirations.

None of Visiak’s brothers seems to have become a sculptor (though two — John and Frank, again — would follow the family tradition on their mother’s side by heading Searcys in the interwar years, Frank actually rescuing the company from financial straits thanks to his independent success as a business- and statesman in Malaya[6]). Visiak found a job with the Indo-European Telegraph Company as a telegraph operator,[7] working for a brief (but unhappy) spell in their Manchester offices before returning to London, to become senior clerk at their Mincing Lane office. (It was relatively free of telegraph traffic until the evenings,[8] allowing him to read, write, and entertain visitors in the mornings and afternoons. He composed many of his Buccaneer Ballads in that office,[9] and wrote his first novel, The Haunted Island, on the train to and from work.[10])

When the 1916 Military Service Act introduced conscription for unmarried men between the ages of 18 and 40, Visiak (then 36 years old) registered himself as a conscientious objector. The Military Service Tribunal awarded him a certificate of exemption, but withdrew it the following year in light of the increasingly desperate need for soldiers. Visiak appealed the decision in March 1917, stating that his objection was “on grounds of Christianity”, and quoting Coleridge’s dictum that the faith “commands its disciples to be perfectly non-resistant.” “Non-resistance to evil”, he went on to say, “is the most profound of all metaphysics”, and added his belief that “war produces war”, and that “all European wars are inter-related and inter-connected by a subtle system.” In addition, he resigned his post at The Indo-European Telegraph Company, as the work he was doing there was about to become classed as war-work, and Visiak objected to any activity in support of the war.[11] The tribunal accepted his appeal, as long as he took on work of national importance. Visiak found himself work on a farm, but after a few months was signed off by a doctor for “a severe form of Neuralgia due to dental troubles”. Eventually, he was declared unfit for farm work and had to find himself something else, or risk revocation of his certificate of exemption. He found it with a Quaker charity, The Bedford Institute (known today as Quaker Social Action), helping both at their boys’ clubs and visiting poor and underprivileged boys at their homes. (This was considered work of national importance, as, according to the Institute, there was felt to be “a serious deterioration among the young people of the land since the outbreak of the War”.) The work was for 8 or 9 hours a day, including evenings, and was unpaid apart from expenses. This was accepted by the tribunal, and Visiak retained his conscientious objector status.[12]

Advert for Visiak’s school, which ran in the Hampstead News in 1923

After the War, Visiak worked as a teacher, spending some years at York House School in Hampstead. In 1915 he was present at the school’s Speech Day, having judged a story-writing prize.[13] He evidently already knew the school’s headmaster, the Reverend Cambridge Victor Hawkins (1872–1949), as the two had collaborated on a novel, The War of the Schools, published in 1912. Whether Visiak was a member of staff at this time or not, he certainly was from 1919 until 1923, when he left to start his own school. Like York House School, this was to be a small establishment, run in a (large) family home. Visiak’s Ascham House Preparatory School for Boys was advertised throughout 1923, but not that I can find in any subsequent years. (A letter from Visiak in the Daily News in 1928, however, gives his address as Ascham House School.) During his time at York House School, Visiak edited the school magazine, The Owl,[14] and on leaving was said to have “made literature a very live subject”.[15] He refers, in one of his letters to David Lindsay,[16] to the death of a boy from the school during his time there. This was the thirteen-year-old Trevor Gush, killed while riding pillion on a motorbike on 19th November 1921.

J R Skelton illustration for E H Visiak’s poem, “The Buccaneer's Return”, in The Graphic, Christmas 1911

Visiak was already starting to make inroads into the area that would become the main focus of his life, literature and literary scholarship. He had already been publishing poetry, starting with Buccaneer Ballads in 1910, which had an introduction by John Masefield (Poet Laureate in 1930). Flints and Flashes followed in 1911, then The Phantom Ship and Other Poems in 1912, all following a nautical theme. (The sea was important for Visiak, it being one of the reasons he moved to Hove in later life.) 1916’s The Battle Fiends was, in part, Visiak’s response to the Great War. Meanwhile, in prose, he produced The Haunted Island, A Pirate Romance in 1910, and a collaboration, The War of the Schools, A Suburban School Tale in 1912, “a little story of a rivalry between three establishments”,[17] with C V Hawkins. During this time he was also submitting poems, often very short ones, to periodicals such as The Graphic and The Daily News, some of which would eventually be collected in 1919 in Brief Poems. For all of his writings, he used the pen-name “E H Visiak”, this being an old variation of his family name, Physick.

Visiak was an inveterate writer of letters to the papers, often expressing a compassionate viewpoint on the events of the day. He was a passionate antivivisectionist, at one point contemplating studying physiology so he could infiltrate laboratories and expose what they were doing.[18] From 1910 onwards, he can be found writing against the death penalty, the force-feeding of suffragists, “the insane arrogance of militarism” in Germany,[19] and wrote to a US newspaper after it reported the lynching and burning of an African American (for which Visiak received “a reviling reply”[20]); but also on less controversial topics, such as the possible reduction in the thickness of books thanks to Edison’s idea of replacing paper with ultra-thin nickel sheets,[21] and whether a 1923 pram race was harmful to the infants involved. In a 1939 letter to The Times, he suggests propaganda leaflets air-dropped into Germany be kept brief, to reduce the chance of people being caught reading them.[22]

Visiak’s real literary success came as a critic. In 1923 he published Milton Agonistes, A Metaphysical Criticism, which considered Paradise Lost as a tragedy in the classical sense. Subsequent critical work, such as editing the Nonsuch Press edition of Milton’s works in 1938, publishing The Portent of Milton, Some Aspects of His Genius in 1958, and The Mirror of Conrad in 1968, made his reputation and won him the civil list pension which meant he didn’t have to worry about money. He was, by this time, already part of the literary world, being included, for instance, at a Poetry Circle dinner at the Lyceum Club in 1921 (alongside Walter de la Mare and Edith Nesbit),[23] writing articles for such periodicals as The Nineteenth Century and Notes & Queries, and giving lectures (one on the German Romantic writer Ludwig Tieck, for instance[24]).

Medusa by E H Visiak, Gollancz reissue

His friendship with David Lindsay began after reading The Haunted Woman when it was serialised in The Daily News in 1921. Visiak wrote to Lindsay at a time when Lindsay was in need of a sign that someone, somewhere, was responding to his work. Visiak then sought out A Voyage to Arcturus, and sent Lindsay copies of The Phantom Ship and The Haunted Island. In return, Lindsay shared his philosophical “sketch notes”, of which Visiak typed a copy and offered to show them to Walter de la Mare. Their correspondence seems to have continued until some time after 1924, when it lapsed, then revived in 1929, after Visiak lent A Voyage to Arcturus to the publisher Victor Gollancz (then in the process of bringing out Visiak’s weird sea-adventure, Medusa). As a result, Gollancz contacted Lindsay, who wrote to Visiak to thank him, also sending him a copy of The Adventures of Monsieur de Mailly.

They met for the first time in 1929, perhaps when Lindsay was visiting his sister, Margaret (living in Croydon at the time). After this, Visiak would often stay with the Lindsays in Ferring, and came to nickname Lindsay’s daughters “Day” and “Night” after their contrasting shades of hair. Visiak also contrived for Lindsay to be invited to a society evening in London, whose hostess was keen to meet “celebrities”. Lindsay (who was obviously not enjoying the event) fell asleep, but Visiak convinced the hostess he was in fact in a state of deep concentration.[25]

He would go on to champion Lindsay’s work several times, including an article for Notes & Queries, “The Arcturan Shadow”, which became the introduction to the Gollancz reissue of A Voyage to Arcturus (when it, and The Haunted Woman, came out as part of the 1946 “Connoisseur’s Library of Strange Fiction”, which also included Visiak’s Medusa).

Visiak’s father died in 1921. His mother, Maude, lived with Visiak until her death in 1953. Throughout the 20s and 30s, he and his mother were in London, at 30 Cavendish Road, then 38 Rutland Park Mansions (both in Willesden), before moving to Hove by the 1940s, where Visiak would remain till his death in 1972. (His final address, 23 Pembroke Avenue, adjoins Pembroke Crescent, where David Lindsay lived.)

In 1968, Visiak produced a memoir of his early years, Life’s Morning Hour. He had always felt life was at its purest and truest in childhood, after which, with the coming of adulthood, things could never be the same. This is how the view is stated by Mr Huxtable in Medusa:

“This topic of childhood and the enchantment it casts, has powerfully worked in my thoughts, and was the ferment of my philosophy when first I became sensible of its loss and what a brave glittering robe was fallen from me into the past. It’s my first chapter of Genesis, which, in that story of lost Paradise, is a grand fable of the beginning of our life in this world; when we are innocently happy, or, as I may express this harmonious state, happily whole. There is as yet no rift to set body and spirit out of tune in their jangling spheres, and the elements are so mingled in us as that we may truly be called, in those eloquent words, living souls...”

Around this time, Colin Wilson, reading a Gollancz reissue of Arcturus and finding the book puzzling, wrote to Visiak “for elucidation”.[26] The two continued corresponding, and in 1967 Wilson received “an utterly miserable letter” from the older man, who, he concluded, “was dying of boredom”. Deciding Visiak needed a project, Wilson suggested they work on a biography of Lindsay together, and when it was found that J B Pick was planning a similar venture, they combined their efforts into The Strange Genius of David Lindsay, which came out in 1970. Of the three contributors, Visiak was the only one to have actually known Lindsay.

Visiak lived to the impressive age of 94. (Impressive, but not a Physick record, as his brother Frank Savill Physick — the one who rescued Searcys thanks to his success in Malaya, and who, incidentally, may have been instrumental in the UK’s adoption of the PAYE scheme of employee taxation — made it to 101.)

His Medusa became a sought-after “lost classic” after Karl Edward Wagner included it in a list of “The 13 Best Supernatural Horror Novels” in the June 1983 issue of Twilight Zone Magazine, leading many seekers after horror to try to track down this (by then) rare tome. Wagner perhaps oversold it:

“If David Lindsay had written Treasure Island in the throes of a peyote-induced religious experience... Well, if Coleridge had given Melville a hand on Moby Dick after a few pipes of opium...”

Colin Wilson, writing of the novel, also brings in a comparison with Melville:

Medusa is an extraordinary book, and its style has no doubt prevented it from being recognised as a Kafka-esque vision; the Defoe-like clarity forms a strange contrast to the stifling nightmare atmosphere... It is far more elusive than Moby Dick, yet the intention seems in many ways similar.”

Eagle and Earwig: Essays on Books and Writers by Colin Wilson, p. 160

He goes on to say:

“Visiak seems to be haunted by a vision of the unsayable. Primarily he is a poet, not a conscious literary artist, although his books on Milton and Conrad reveal a keen critical intelligence. The very nature of Medusa means that, unlike Arcturus, it can never make its appeal to the general reader; but it will undoubtedly never lack a small audience of enthusiastic readers.”

Eagle and Earwig: Essays on Books and Writers by Colin Wilson, p. 161

According to Life’s Morning Hour, that “vision of the unsayable” was part of Visiak’s actual experience, as he relates at one point having a vision of God that was:

“...unimaginable and, although seen clearly and definitely, indescribable, incomparable with any known form. I could no more describe it than I could describe an unknown colour had I seen one.”

Life’s Morning Hour by E H Visiak, p. 210-211

— something that surely can’t help recalling, to readers of this site, David Lindsay’s invented colours on Tormance in A Voyage to Arcturus.

separator image

See my review of Anthony Harrison-Barbet's E H Visiak: Writer and Mystic for more on this writer.

You can also read a short article Visiak wrote for the Third Programme adaptation of A Voyage to Arcturus here.

E H Visiak Bibliography

separator image


  • 1^A Biographical Dictionary of Sculptors in Britain, 1660-1851, The Physick Family
  • 2^Life’s Morning Hour, p. 94
  • 3^ — For instance, the Biography at the Archives Hub page for the Papers of E H Visiak, at And thanks to Julie Baugh, librarian at the school, for letting me know Visiak did definitely attend there.
  • 4^ — Available at
  • 5^ — Mr Frank Physick obituary, The Times, 3rd March 1983
  • 6^ — Mr Frank Physick obituary, The Times, 3rd March 1983
  • 7^ — Wilson, Introduction to The Violet Apple & The Witch, p. 2
  • 8^Life’s Morning Hour, p. 170
  • 9^Life’s Morning Hour, p. 171
  • 10^Life’s Morning Hour, p. 173
  • 11^Life's Morning Hour, p. 216. Thanks to David Power for this info.
  • 12^ — This paragraph's information from documents held at The National Archives, "Case Number: M3594. Edward Harold Physick of 306 Cavendish Road, Brondesbury"
  • 13^Hampstead News, 30th December 1915, p5, “York House School”
  • 14^Hampstead News, 7th August 1919, p6, “School Journalism”
  • 15^Hampstead News, 2nd August 1915, p5, “York House School Speech Day”
  • 16^ — Lindsay mentions a recent tragedy at Visiak's school in a letter written on 25/11/1921, Adam International #346-348, p. 44
  • 17^The Athanaeum, no. 4438, Nov 16 1912, p. 585.
  • 18^Life’s Morning Hour, p. 210
  • 19^Pall Mall Gazette, 10 August 1914
  • 20^Life’s Morning Hour, p. 213
  • 21^ — Daily News, 7 Nov 1911; for more on Edison's idea, see “Mr. Edison's Kindle” by Harry McCracken
  • 22^The Times, Points from Letters, 13 Sep 1939
  • 23^The Times, News in Brief, 31st Dec. 1921. p. 5
  • 24^Adam International #346-348, p. 48
  • 25^ — Most of this from Visiak's contributions to The Strange Genius of David Lindsay, 1970, p. 95-135
  • 26^ — Wilson, Introduction to The Violet Apple & The Witch, p. 3